It is only my second time visiting and I have not really looked around much yet.
However, here are some of my initial suggestions:
A. I would put the name of the site, Fragile Deal, somewhere in the page template, at the top.
I came here tonight from a link on the other other place (not the SD “other place”), then I had to leave my computer for a while, came back to it later and saw “Discourse” at the top of the screen and didn’t know what this was (it has been maybe a week since my only other visit to this site, which was a brief one).
Actually, though, I can see where not identifying the site visibly (except for the web address in the address bar) might be convenient for people who try to read it at work or who might want to keep private what site they are reading in a public situation.
It’s just that as far as branding, name recognition, creating a distinct user experience, developing an image, etc. – putting the name somewhere would contribute to that.
B. I agree with the suggestion of using shading/alternate colors to demarcate one post from the next. All this white – it’s too much white.
C. I do like the width of the comments area – it’s a good width and height for each individual post.
(As compared to the other other site where the comments are currently 16.5 inches wide on my 19-inch-horizontal screen.)
D. I don’t like the heart symbol for up-voting.
I don’t think a heart (=love/affection) accurately conveys the varied motivations for approving of a fatwallet-style post, the reasons for which could include: “that’s funny”, “that’s true”, “that had to be said”, “you are a nut”, “I agree”, “gosh, I never knew that”, “this will save me time”, “this will save me money”, “oh, this will tick off someone whom I want to see get ticked off”, etc.
I really dislike the thumbs-up symbol to mean a “like”, but an arrow would be okay. I suppose a plus sign would be fine too.
E. I would like to see a way to down-vote as well as up-vote. Not allowing down-votes gives only half of the picture regarding readers’ responses.
F. I don’t like constant scrolling and would like a way to have pagination
G. The way to quote another person’s post is not straightforward the first time one is trying to figure that out, and I’d prefer to have a “reply by quoting this comment” button next to the “reply (with no quote)” button.
That said, however, the current quoting method (which makes it pretty easy to choose just a small part of the post that is being quoted from) should cut down A LOT on the mindless repetition of very long posts (in quotes) that would happen on FW, particularly in Finance, when people just wanted to indicate that they were responding to a particular poster and didn’t actually need to repeat any of what the quoted post had contained.
So maybe I like the current quoting method. I’ll have to try it again.
Addendum:
When I first typed out this post, I used numbers 1 to 7 instead of letters A to G.
In my composing window, they showed up as numbers 1 to 7.
However, after I submitted my post, the site reformatted my points and they were numbered 1, 2, 3 then 1, 2, 3, etc.
When I pressed “edit” to come back and fix that, in the editing window, the numbered points still showed up as 1 to 7. So something weird might be happening to a numbered “bullet-point” section when a post is published by the software (and it shows up in the thread) that the editor of the post can’t prevent on his/her side of things.
I changed my points to be lettered A to G instead of numbered 1 to 7, and the letters are showing up fine.