I think lots of such people do get that sense of accomplishment. Plenty of people take pride in their work, no matter how tedious or menial it may seem.
Flip the reward - and Iâll bet more often than not, the âratâ navigating the maze will be more satisfied with his kraft cheese product slice than the âratâ who was just handed the aged cheddar. Unless he sees the second rat get handed the better reward, then frustration starts to drown out the feelings of accomplishment.
This reminds me of Abhijit Banerjeeâs findings on poverty in the developing world. He and his wife won the Nobel in Economics for their experimental research. There are several YouTube videos with their MIT lectures on the topic.
I for one like the idea of UBI since it could replace an inefficient pile of governemtn programs SNAP, TANF, Seciton 8, SSNI, unemployment insurance, etc etc
There is a % of the population that wonât work for good or bad reasons. We can have 12 different ways to help them and police them and judge them or we can just cut everyone a check and not care.
I like the idea of rolling all those things into a works program - a guaranteed 8-hr/day job for anyone who wants it. Be it landscaping, copying/filing, janitorial, food service, whatever the local governments have to do (even if itâs sitting in a room waiting patiently all day, if you are too disabled to actually do anything productive). No unemployment, because thereâa always a paycheck available. No SNAP, you want food then you just need to work for the day and you can buy your own. Etc, etc. People can make a career of it if they want.
This is too idealistic. It assumes people want to better their situation and wonât live their entire lives on UBI. Reality is that you canât have an UBI instead of all those programs because people will have different number of dependents, some will live in San Francisco requiring significant payments just to afford an apartment, and so on.
The UBI as a fix-all-problems looks good on paper but itâs impractical in reality.
I see your point, but there are regional adjustments at least to SNAP and SSI â the state adds a little extra to the federal benefits. UBI is not any less practical than the existing assistance programs.
Itâs hard enough to find people to flip burgers at $13/hr now. What happens to the price of going out to eat when it pays more to stay at home than it does to work at one of those places?
I thought the interesting part of the study outcome, even tho it was a one-time payment, was that the recipients were worse off financially (due to the windfall encouraging their poor impulse control for more spending) as well as health-wise (physically and mentally). So yes, stopping or cutting back on work at least for this cohort was a bad outcome, not a good one.
I think the issue between the UBI / welfare optimists and the pessimists is that the optimists think they would be happier if they had a bit more money, could work a bit less, etc, but they are competent enough in their personal and professional lives to be studying academic aspects of economics or politics - for them it might be true. The actual people theyâre trying to help are nothing like that - if they had the dedication, self control, mental ability, etc to be philosophizing on public policy theories, they wouldnât be 50% unemployed and living on $1500/mo of welfare. Those people react very differently and need different things, and apparently for them, itâs âmore money, more problemsâ, something the elites donât run into til they hit 8 figures and donât know what to do with themselves either.
Thatâs not an unpaid job. That is a responsibility freely undertaken by choice.
Then itâs not unpaid. As well, there are millions of stay at home parents, primarily women, who will attest to the rewards of watching their children grow into responsible adults.
I doubt your doubt, but will accept your doubt, for the sake of argument. Then they should be doing something that does give them a sense of accomplishment. Even if it is just a stepping stone to where they eventually want to be. Some might consider my first non-entrepreneurial job as manual or tedious. I took pride in all of the work that job entailed, though it sometimes wasnât pleasant.
Said by every hooker to every vice cop. But Iâm sure you did it perfectly. Doesnât a job well done, in and of itself, provide a sense of accomplishment?
Itâs not much of a choice for many, given the cost of daycare.
No. They werenât the kind of jobs that could be done perfectly or imperfectly, just done. I couldnât wait to get out of there. I got more satisfaction out of doing homework.
I donât assume that myself at all. I assume that there are a small % of peope are basically just lost causes. Weâre alreayd paying them now via the SNAP, TANF, unemployment, etc programs.
UBI just replaces those with a simple system that also tacitly admits that some people arenât going to contribute.
edit to add : The current social net programs do serve useful purppose for many people who have legitimate needs too. Large % of people on aid get themselves off it asap. Between stuff like TANF, unemploymetn insurance, and disability weâve got a mix of programs which address different legitimate need cases. But theres also a % of people who abuse the system and there always will be. Thats the % who donât âwant to better their situationâ.