…or an adversion to facing questions about the complaint.
2 Likes
If he were non-cooperative the feds wouldn’t be interested in bringing charges.
Incidentally, more on an old issue: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30512/w30512.pdf
The difference in Republican vs Democrat deaths only becomes noticeable after the vaccine was available. Thus it isn’t anything preexisting.
1 Like
While I agree with that, unless the Feds approached him before the state court trial and told him not to appear so the case would be dismissed and it could go federal, the feds shouldn’t be touching this with a ten foot pole. With a normal FBI, I would suspect that is exactly what happened. But with a politically motivated FBI and US Attorney’s office, who knows if they actually did that or if they are just prosecuting anyone they can possibly indict for federal crimes against abortion providers. Considering how they served the arrest warrant for someone they planned to release on his own recognizance, the facts of this case, and how hard it is to win a FACE act violation case in the first place, I wouldn’t be surprised if they actually took this case without much regard for the reliability of the complainant.
1 Like
They saw the complaint, decided it just absolutely had to be prosecuted, so when it faded away at the state level they trumped up an edited complaint that [kinda] gave them jurisdiction instead.
3 Likes
The Twitter meltdown by the left begins again. I hope it’s as much fun as the first time.
Edit.
Politico puts their finger on one of the awful possibilities (to them): the return of President Trump to Twitter
“If Trump is able to throw his support behind candidates with a very loud megaphone that may not be factually accurate, sharing misinformation and disinformation, that can absolutely sway elections away from Democrats,” Jablonowski said.
2 Likes
That, along with “you’re a victim, and the Republican’s don’t care (or made you one)” should be the first two planks of every Democrat Platform since the 80’s.
The vaccine is perfectly safe and effective. 
1 Like
Funny, but a big miss on the last 5 lines IMO. Pretty sure he got the media narrative completely reversed on those.
The sexism ones are true, we all know it 
Also, how often does a “female shooter” happen? Probably not often enough to make the chart.
Where’s the raspberry emoji?
I suppose the last three could say shrink Israel instead of ban, or maybe blame Israel. that seems to the narrative I see when I can’t avoid the mainstream news.
There’s no reason the feds would tell him not to appear in state court–even if they were politically driven there’s no reason to avoid the state charges.
However, to the extent the FBI is biased it’s to the right, not the left. You’ve bought the Republican lies hook, line and sinker.
There have been countless articles and reports supporting the notion that the FBI is being used as a tool benefitting the Democrats. Have you posted a single thing that actually contradicts this, let alone indicates a conservative bias instead? Or are you just tossing out baseless rebuttals in the hopes that a few might buy it?
2 Likes
There has been an incredible stream of right-wing disinformation. It’s impossible to rebut every bit of it and nobody even tries. Note how the attacks on the FBI stem from two things: A failure to take seriously that laptop drive (which was utterly compromised, there was no reason to investigate it) and their document-recovery raid. They found classified documents, there should have been no classified documents there–they clearly were on target.
Why do you opine with such confidence on things you know nothing about? There is a very good reason to tell him not to appear in court. Anything he says in state court that contradicts the facts needed to prove the FACE act violation can be used by the defendant to get out of the charges. Considering the fact that the complainant’s original criminal complaint did just that, the feds had every reason to keep the complainant from testifying in state court.
Aside from the fact that I have eyes and ears to see, read, and hear what the FBI has been doing for the past 7 years, I’m also very good friends with a special agent supervisor (he was the best man at my wedding) and his special agent wife. When the rank and file admit there is a bias at a certain level and complain about what the agency has become, you can rest assured it isn’t just right wing propaganda.
2 Likes
Except you tried to do just that in summary fashion. And have yet to reference a single thing supporting your claim of a conservative bias. All you’ve ever accomplished is making it clear that you consider anything you dont like to inherently be disinformation.
BTW, I’m pretty sure the FBI showed no bias regarding that laptop, since they gave no comment whatsoever (since, ya’ know, it was an active investigation). The bias was in the media reporting, where it “clearly” was fake Russian propaganda that didnt really exist (without ever bothering to ask those involved if it did exist) - until suddenly one day it turns out it was real and did exist and was being investigated.
4 Likes
There was a claim of bias in not investigating it. There’s simply nothing to investigate, it’s compromised, it doesn’t matter what they find.
There has been one appreciable example of bias–the announcement that perhaps cost Hillary the race. Otherwise, the FBI simply hasn’t gone full crazy.
And what supposed claim would be such??
Yet it eventually came out that there was an ongoing investigation. And the stuff on the laptop is either authentic or it isn’t, there is no “compromised”. And to date absolutely no one (with any direct knowledge) on either side has claimed it’s contents were not authentic.
But that’s old news - which I suspect is why you injected it into the discussion…
1 Like
for the third time… READ THE ARTICLE
2 Likes
Here’s a trailer for the new movie “what is a woman?”
You Seem to have to join and pay for their streaming service to watch it
https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe-today-two
And I see no reason to trust the reporting is honest. I find tons of articles from the right wing and basically nothing else–that sounds like garbage to rile up the sheep.
…and still more rebuttal based solely on the premise that “I dont like it so it must be fake!”
Or it means that it’s true, so the left wing has a vested interest in sweeping those pesky facts under the rug…
3 Likes