I’m surprised how hate-filled and intolerant y’all are of someone you clearly believe is suffering from mental illness.
Difficult to imagine a Biden supporter patronizing Trump’s hotels.
But it isnt hard to imagine a Biden supporter getting a room at Trump’s hotel, intentionally destroying the room, then bitching about how unfair and racist and intollerent it is to be sent the repair bill…
2 Likes
Unfortunately Trump’s mental illness doesn’t insulate the rest of America from the consequences of his crimes. There’s nothing hate-filled or intolerant associated with the discussions…
And unfortunately the mental illness is not confined to just Trump and his fake lawyers.
And yet another grossly misleading headline. Pence has not in any way even implied that he will choose the winner “as he sees fit”. In fact
Pence has not indicated his own view of his power as the presiding officer on Jan. 6, and he hasn’t indicated whether he intends to introduce the unofficial elector slates that Trump allies claim to have cast in order to compete with the certified slates submitted in states like Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia.
So the entire subject of the article is third party speculation about what might be possible, no different than all the liberal left-wing articles making up all the terrible things Trump could potentially do, then presenting it as something he is planning to try to do for no reason but further fuel the hate and outrage…
Although the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution requires Pence, as vice president, to preside over the Jan. 6 session, his authority is detailed in the Electoral Count Act of 1887. It requires Pence to introduce electors alphabetically by state, and it sets out a process for House members and senators to challenge disputed electors.
So… what you’re saying is that everything people are bitching about as an outrageous attack on democracy is in fact being done in accordance to the law as a means of ensuring democracy is preserved?
Why cant you just let the process play out, instead of being so insistent that the rule of law be bypassed? I can only imagine the outrage should someone on trial for murder be shot dead by the judge on the premise that “he was going to be found guilty and sentenced to death anyways”.
1 Like
Trump friends like Saudis and Russians use his hotels. If they are sending officials or reporters to the inauguration, they still might stay there.
They still might stay there if they think Trump might have future influence.
He sounds like the new front runner for the 2024 GOP Presidential nomination.
No, your entire reply is just a failure at reading comprehension.
The title did not say pence said that. It clearly referred to the claim in Gohmert’s bogus lawsuit.
It made no such claim that pence said that, like you indicated it did.
1 Like
The intended implication is clear, that this is an option Pence is considering. You have to read the article to find out that it really means that some guy is just claiming that he thinks it would be legal.
Lol. Elected federal Representatives aren’t just “some guy” claiming its legal for the sitting VP to choose the next President as he sees fit.
2 Likes
He’s not Pence or one of Pence’s advisors, he’s a third party to Pence’s actions. So yeah, when it comes to what Pence might do, he is just “some guy”.
No, the other nutcases elected are evidence of a large ongoing problem.
Yes, it’s not about Pence’s actions, which no one except you have made that strange leap. The quote was from the lawsuit filed against Pence. No, that doesn’t imply that Pence said what was in the lawsuit like you say it does.
But… Trump apologists consistently say: “There’s no harm in Trump boosting Qanon terrorist conspiracy theories!” (which include the 5G conspiracy theory)
- Establish vaccination sites throughout the state, perhaps in every school. Make sure that a medical professional is in each school building to be able to respond to a reaction that >might occur.
- Schedule vaccinations according to a person’s priority category and birthdate: e.g., people in group A with a January first birthday would be assigned a specific day to receive their vaccination
…and about six seconds after Trump were to announce such a plan, half the state governors would be all over the news with some version “I’ll be damned if that arrogant a$$hole thinks he can tell me what to do in my state!”
I highly doubt States would object to help with distribution and deployment of the vaccine. Trump didn’t seem to care about deploying federal troops to “restore order” in cities that had BLM protesters. He is probably very busy on more important matters right now
1 Like
The states really have no excuse for the failings on their end. They were told back in Sept to start planning for mass vaccine rollouts, cold chain logistics, etc. there’s been plenty of poor logistics to go around, including at the companies making the vaccine and federally, but most of the final outcomes will come down to state and local distribution.
3 Likes
Four days from today, Saturday, the fate of America will hang in the balance in the state of Georgia . . . . .
But wait! Four days from now is next Wednesday, you cry. Election day is three days hence, on Tuesday.
Correct. It will take until late on Tuesday for the honest rural Georgia counties to count their votes and make known their outcomes. Only thereafter, on Wednesday, will Georgia Democrats in the cities begin to tally a sufficient number of phoney and fraudulent votes so as to overcome their disadvantage and win the election . . . . . same as they did back early in November.
So you see I’m right. The election will actually be decided four days from now, not three. In today’s America, elections are not over until all the bogus votes are counted.
Pro-Trump lawyer Lin Wood tweets that Mike Pence should face execution by firing squad
Trump supporters, is this helping America in any way? This man is given support by Trump and his supporters. They cheer him as he speaks.
Good summary of the agenda and what may or may not happen based on the GA outcome.
In other news, I see Biden is angling to take over Obama’s role as the NRA gun salesman of the year with his proposed gun restrictions (but only on law abiding citizens, a very small part of the problem; perhaps gun control only for Democrats would be more agreeable and more effective, given who commits gun crimes and their voting patterns).