Anti-woke investing opportunities

Perhaps the losses in all businesses are related to their woke attitude? They have lost a ton of money on their woke movies. This probably hurt their brand on their streaming services. Regarding Disney+, the article says that other streaming services like Netflix are doing great business.

By comparison, Netflix Inc. has rallied 49% this year — it now trades at about 32 times forward earnings

Earlier this year attendance was down in their Florida parks. If @scripta’s observation is statistically valid, then Disney’s shenanigans in Florida might explain the discrepancy.

1 Like

But it doesnt explain similar drops at Universal, Busch Gardens, and Sea World.

Just like “doing great” Netflix - which is still down 50% off it’s highs from a couple years ago. Much like Disney.

Disney’s performance isnt exactly an anomaly. You are trying way to hard to isolate a cause/effect relationship. It’d be more accurate to suggest that Florida’s politics have had an adverse effect on all it’s theme parks; there’s actual data to support that connnection, even though it’s the opposite of where you want to place the blame…

2 Likes

After a slew of breathless MSM articles along the lines of “this is the end of Trump’s Media business” regarding the recent deadline for the shareholder vote on extension of the SPAC merger between DWAC and Truth Social, ala

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/09/02/truth-social-trump-media-digital-world/

it turns out, unsurprisingly, the DWAC shareholders like Trump’s Media stuff and voted for it in enough quantities to get another year of SEC obstruction to the merger. The fact that the stock was $15-20 and liquidation would be around $11 (a loss for all shareholders) probably helped too.

2 Likes

Looks like money overruled Nike’s woke politics

2 Likes

Meanwhile, across the rest of the country, some big-box retailers have either closed up shop or taken new security measures in stores for similar reasons.

No, not “across the rest of the country”. It’s mostly in pretty specific areas, and often aligned with certain political ideals of the prevailing powers. But, no need to bother mentioning that…

2 Likes

Another get woke, go broke company

Cathleen Chen reported that the brand’s efforts to promote inclusivity – which included making LGBTQ pro women’s soccer player and outspoken leftist Megan Rapinoe, as well as a transgender woman, brand spokesmodels and getting rid of its famous “Angels” supermodels – gained “favorable reviews from online critics [but] never translated into sales.”

According to the numbers, the lingerie brand’s projected revenue for 2023 is $6.2 billion, which is 5% lower than it was last year, and even lower than 2020, when the brand’s revenue was $7.5 billion.

3 Likes

So, $%^&, (%#, or (#*$% women don’t sell sexy lingerie as well as previous models? I’m shocked!!! According to wokesters, there’s no real difference. :rofl:

2 Likes

Get woke, go broke the sinking good money after bad edition

Apparently all Anheuser Busch brands are being affected not just Bud Light.

Meanwhile, these woke geniuses are feeling the heat

2 Likes

InBev continues to light their money on fire.

The tie-up with Anheuser-Busch’s beleaguered brew — which has been slammed with sharp sales declines since its fleeting, ill-fated campaign in April with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney — is reportedly worth more than $100 million, according to MMA Fighting.

“UFC BOYCOTT IS ON,” one user shared to X following the announcement, which will see Bud Light’s logo on fighting rinks and in marketing materials as of January.

“Time to double down on the #BoycottBudLight and now #BoycottUFC,” another posted, while yet another chimed in: “Dumb move.”

2 Likes

DIS is a bad investment

Doubling down on LGBTQ content for children

Will Disney ever learn from its mistakes? Probably not.

Disney spent 2023 doubling down on gay and transgender messaging to children. As Breitbart News reported, GLAAD recently announced that Disney (and Netflix) produced more LGBTQ content than any other major Hollywood studio.

At its theme parks, men in drag are greeting children in what has become the company’s inexplicable embrace of gender non-conformity.

2 Likes

thought you’d appreciate this

3 Likes

!@*&%!!! @xerty, you got me again. One day, I will learn to check the source. Thanks for a very good belly laugh.

1 Like

More verification that the consumer does not want battery cars

2 Likes

Rental EVs make even less sense than buying them. When do you typically rent a car? EV shortcomings are only magnified in such situations. Long trips, unfamiliar areas (with no clue where charging may be available), even as a replacement vehicle while your car is in the shop.

I dont know if this divestiture reflects on general sentiment, it’s just the fact people dont rent cars in situations where they have the time and ability to familiarize themselves with the car.

2 Likes

LOL. You see verification in every headline that agrees with your opinion, don’t you?

Hertz overestimated the demand and bought too many cars, and now they’re correcting to meet the actual demand. It’s not like they’re selling their entire EV fleet.

There’s a lot of “overestimating demand”. EVs are also piling up in dealerships lots.

Comment— The reporter could not resist the pun. LOL

here’s why Americans won’t charge in

Edit.

You see verification in every headline that agrees with your opinion, don’t you?

I present evidence instead of just making assertions like you do.

1 Like

No, you made an assertion (“consumer does not want battery cars”), then misrepresented the Hertz article as evidence. The USA Today article is better evidence for your assertion.

EVs are too expensive to begin with. And the stupidity that is the California AB 205 (income-based fixed utility charge) introduces further uncertainty in the value proposition (CA is the biggest EV market). I want an EV or PHEV and I know multiple happy Tesla owners, but I just can’t justify it financially. They’re piling up at dealerships probably because production has outpaced the number of people who can afford / justify them.

I, of course, disagree with you. Car renters are consumers, and the fact that they prefer gasoline engine cars to EV‘s is certainly evidence that EVs are unattractive to them.

You say that you are eager to buy an EV. So I assume that given the opportunity to rent one versus a gasoline powered car, you would choose the EV. Of course not all people dislike EVs. But the evidence is that it’s a lot fewer than the numbers that Hertz and the car manufacturers thought.

Glitch asserts that the use case for rental cars is different than everyday drive. That people drive longer distances? I’d be interested in seeing statistics about that. I have rented a car many times just to drive a few miles within the city from the airport to my hotel to meetings and then back.

So I think my citation of the article about rental cars is good evidence. It is certainly much better than the zero evidence that you have presented for your case.

I gave examples of why you rent a car. Including your exact use case - where you fly into an unfamiliar area and don’t have time to waste figuring out charging logistics/piss around worrying about if you’ll need to recharge at some point.

All I was saying is that the EVs are a niche market, the rental EV market is even narrower. Dumping a fleet of rental EVs is pretty straightforward and isn’t much of an indicator of anything deeper.

1 Like

This may be true for rental purposes and should not be generalized.

When you assume, you make an ass of u and me. Not being part of the EV ecosystem yet, I have not tried to figure out what is required of me to charge the EV, how much it costs, etc. EV owners have apps on their phones that make finding a charger easier. They know what kind of charger they need, where to find it, and how to pay for it, and which ones are free if they have that benefit. Plus I only rent when away from home and usually when driving long distances, thus possibly requiring multiple charges.