Does the coronavirus merit investment, or personal, concern or consideration?

Origins - the DoE joins the FBI in concluding it was most likely a lab leak.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a

https://www.wsj.com/articles/another-turn-in-the-wuhan-leak-story-journal-energy-department-lab-gain-of-function-nih-ae9baed4

The U.S. Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a laboratory leak, according to a classified intelligence report recently provided to the White House and key members of Congress.

The shift by the Energy Department, which previously was undecided on how the virus emerged, is noted in an update to a 2021 document by Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines’s office.

The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research.

2 Likes

I guess the DOE and FBI will be kicked off facebook any day now. :slight_smile: Fortunately, freedom of speech is now available on Twitter.

Follow up mask coverage

Whatever theoretical benefits there might be, in clinical trials the benefits have turned out to be either illusory or offset by negative factors. Oxford’s Tom Jefferson, the lead author of the Cochrane review, summed up the real science on masks: “There is just no evidence that they make any difference. Full stop.”

This lack of evidence would be enough to keep any new drug or medical treatment from being approved—much less one whose purported benefits had not even been weighed against the harmful side effects. As the Cochrane reviewers disapprovingly note, few of the clinical trials of masks even bothered to collect data on the harmful effects on subjects. Most public health officials and journalists have ignored the downsides, too, and social media platforms have censored evidence of those harms. But there’s no doubt, from dozens of peer-reviewed studies, that masks cause social, psychological, and medical problems, including a constellation of maladies called “Mask-Induced Exhaustion Syndrome.”

2 Likes

That paper is really weird. In the appendices, it shows that they selected things entirely unrelated to masking, like wearing sunglasses, gargling Vitamin D or putting Iodine on your hands.

At the end, they essentially say that they got inconclusive results, but the studies that actually have to deal with masking when it comes to N95s in hospital settings in their appendix show that they do their thing.

I can buy that the mandates might not have been effective, but it’s really hard to support that conclusion from the data that they provided, and they say that they have “Low to Moderate” confidence in that conclusion.

Just curious - why does the Dept of Energy have a stake in covid origination? Doesnt seem like something they’d be investigating.

Really???

I had judged you to be old enough to know that EVERY government entity expands in as many directions as possible, logic be da**ned.

The National Laboratories are all part of DoE.

3 Likes

Good recap of CDC/NIH lies during the pandemic, when they knew better at the time.

One big one was that natural immunity was worse than vaccines, hence justifying mandates for Covid survivors. Lies and flies in the face of obvious immunology to boot. More on that.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/three-years-late-the-lancet-recognizes-natural-immunity-great-barrington-declaration-tech-censor-antibodies-mandates-b3ba912c

tech companies suppressed discussions of natural immunity. Twitter flagged posts that claimed natural immunity was superior to vaccines as “misleading.” Facebook’s misinformation policystill restricts distribution of content that “implicitly discourages vaccination by advocating for alternatives” such as “natural immunity.”

The false denial of natural immunity caused vaccine skeptics to dig in and fueled suspicions that public-health officials were in the pocket of vaccine makers and dishonest about other things as well.

The Lancet study could serve a useful political purpose by giving public-health officials cover to relax vaccine mandates, which in turn could reduce resistance to vaccines. But this would require the clerisy to concede its opponents were right.

2 Likes

You can debate over why they lied, and whether they thought it was in the public interest, but you cannot possibly believe this is in the public interest, well, not Black Americans’ interest.

The premise is that in a pandemic or other worldwide disease emergency, Americans should not get better or faster health care than inhabitants of third world countries.

3 Likes

Changes due to the expiring Pandemic Emergency. Telehealth to see docs to continue (wasn’t clear but at least thru 2024), but will need good encryption (no FaceTime) and can’t proscribe harder drugs that way.

2 Likes

The truth about the lies and doubledealing are coming out but of course the left-wing media are ignoring it. I wonder if the regime’s department of justice will prosecute Fauci for ignoring a subpoena from Congress/sarcasm

2 Likes

I don’t. It will be a definite NO from Biden DOJ. I wonder if Fauci is contributing to the Big Guy’s retirement account.

Gain of function is supported by Fauci and Biden, whether you want it or not.

A good compromise might be requiring the government to review potential GOF experiments AND those so classified could only be published or cited in a classified government academic journal for that kind of research.

If you can’t get publication bragging rights out of your experiments, I bet a whole lot less of them will get done by academics.

1 Like

Yeah, but on the other hand that’sagreeing that doing stupid dangerous stuff is ok as long as nobody knows and you dont get caught. Which is the perfect set-up for another situation that mirrors what happened 3 years ago.

That does seem to be the standard liberal process though. 10% for the big guy is fine as long as nobody know, censoring news for your own benefit is ok as long as nobody knows, etc, etc, etc.

1 Like

Ha! ha! What does China care about rights? Did you forget where this virus was created? The U.S. has already provided their intellectual property. China no longer needs us, but was happy to take our money that 'ol doc Fauci gave to them.

Finally, the only thing that gets published in China is the propaganda that the Chicoms pronounce as the truth.

Origins and coverup by Fauci

“So three days after they [several virologists] say it came from a lab, they changed their position, and the only intervening event was a conference call with Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins. Again, a call that Mr. Redfield (CDC Director at the time) was not allowed to be on … And then three months later, Shazam! They get 9 million bucks from Dr. Fauci. Why, isn’t that something?”

2 Likes

Repeating one of the GOAT’s favorite catchphrases … “Follow the money”.

More proof of government collusion and censorship of true but off-narrative stories, covering things like natural immunity.

the new files are chilling in the details allegedly showing how the Virality Project labeled even true stories as “anti-vaccine” and, therefore, subject to censorship. These files would suggest that the Project eagerly worked to limit free speech and suppress alternative scientific viewpoints.

Taibbi describes the Virality Project as “a sweeping, cross-platform effort to monitor billions of social media posts by Stanford University, federal agencies, and a slew of (often state-funded) NGOs.”

1 Like

They would only “suggest” to idiots, or progressives, and I don’t presume that’s necessarily redundant … but don’t rule it out, either. They are proof positive to anyone looking at the full scope / history of the attempts to control the populace during the covid “scare”.

The regime, of course, continues to cover up and stone wall.

The FDA had approved COVID vaccines on an emergency -use basis in December 2020, before Biden even took office.

Newly released emails reveal that Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock was concerned because “states cannot require mandatory vaccination” without FDA final approval, according to the chief of FDA’s vaccine-review office, Marion Gruber.

Gruber warned that a thorough evaluation was needed due to “increasing evidence of association of this vaccine and development of myocarditis (especially in young males).”

After Gruber balked, Woodcock placed a loyal subordinate in charge of the process, and the vaccine got full approval Aug. 23.

3 Likes