High Interest Savings Megathread

Offer: https://www.insightcards.com/card-features/
Interest 5%
Max Balance $5000
Fees None if you don’t use the debit card

Offer: https://redneck.bank/mega-money-market/
Interest 1.5%
Max Balance $35,000
Fees None with online statements

4 Likes

Wiki - This post can be edited by all members as a summary of the content of this topic.

Offer: https://www.bankoncit.com/high-yield-savings/
Interest 1.35% APY
Max Balance $250,000
Fees None

Offer: https://www.gsbank.com/savings-products/online-savings.html?prod=SAV
Interest 1.30% APY
Max Balance $1,000,000
Fees None

Offer: https://www.insightcards.com/card-features/21
Interest 5%
Max Balance $5000
Fees None if you don’t use the debit card

Offer: https://redneck.bank/mega-money-market/4
Interest 1.5%
Max Balance $35,000
Fees None with online statements

Offer: https://www.liveoakbank.com/personal-banking/personal-savings/
Interest 1.4%
Max Balance 1,000,000
Fees None

Offer: https://www.populardirect.com/products/savings/popular-direct-plus-savings
Interest 1.4%
Minimum to Open $5,000
Max Balance None mentioned
Min Balance $500; $4 monthly fee if balance falls below this at the end of any day
Fees $25 Early account closing fee (if closed within 180 days), $5 dormancy fee (if no activity for 12 months), and $5 excessive transaction fee (more than 6 withdrawals in a statement cycle); see https://www.populardirect.com/pdfs/513_Popular_Direct_Plus_Savings_Account_Disclosure.pdf for details

Offer: https://www.purepoint.com/online-banking/savings-account/high-yield?mkwid=gcY3Cy3X&pcrid={creative}&pkw=purepoint%20savings&pmt=e&pdv=c&adid=c5ffa6a8-41ae-47e6-9517-43b0296a9de3&cm_mmc=bing--brand--adword-_-purepoint+savings

Interest 1.4%
Minimum to open $10,000
No fees.

1 Like

Lots of options here:

You can also enter a $ amount to filter by best rate for that balance.

Is this supposed to be the thread that replaces the awesome FWF high yield savings account thread? Did anyone archive that one? We’re really lacking here if not.

This forum doesn’t support table markup properly. That’s what I’m waiting for anyway. Already requested and discussed in the proper sub-forum.

The thread was saved in the wayback machine.