You weren’t making a state by state comparison. We can read what you wrote.
But that’s the thing. It is relevant. Because parents say so. Whether its isolated cases, or those cases are a sample and it is becoming common, parents are upset about it, either way.
Kids are much more likely to be sexually assaulted by a pedophile in school than in church.
There is no conclusive data that kids are more likely to kill themselves if they aren’t allowed to transition as a kid than if they are allowed to. Why do you keep repeating this claim as if it is based in statistical fact?
No one is trying to go back to an illusion. No one is trying to stop the teaching of the historical atrocities of our country. If you can’t point to a law that is outlawing this teaching, you are making a claim that conservatives want to do something out of thin air. You can’t claim that “conservatives are in a race to pass the most extreme measures” and then, as an example claim they don’t want to teach certain history, and then, when asked to produce one of these passed measures, just say, “they’re careful not to be clear about it.” That means that the measure you are claiming exist DON’T ACTUALLY EXIST, and you are just making it up.
Where have you heard anyone say that they are concerned for the feelings of the kids of white supremacists? Or are you just trying to say that any parent voting for a conservative school board member is a white supremacist? Are you calling me a white supremacist?
But we’re told constantly by teachers that “don’t say gay” will mean they can’t answer kids questions like this that pop up. Clearly there are teachers answering these questions. So stop avoiding MY actual question by claiming teachers aren’t doing the thing that the teachers themselves are upset they won’t have the ability to do.
Says who? What is your belief on this based on?
I never took a “basic anatomy” that included informations about genitals in elementary school. I never once learned anything about genitals from a teacher in elementary school. Teaching about genitals in elementary school is not basic anatomy.
“The circulatory system (cardiovascular system) pumps blood from the heart to the lungs to get oxygen.”
is basic elementary school anatomy
“The circulatory system pumps blood into your penis to make it erect when you are sexually aroused.”
is NOT basic elementary school anatomy
30 year ago, not being taught the “basic anatomy” about genitals you claim is fine for elementary school kids to learn, I had no problem avoiding pedophiles. Why exactly do kids need to learn anything about their genitals from teachers vs. parents in order to be safe from abusers? We all learned about “stranger danger” (which was mostly bunk) back in the 90s without any specific mentions of anything beyond the word “private parts” and we turned out fine. Why exactly do you think we should be more specific with kids now?
There is no evidence that the policies conservatives advocate helps abusers - I have no idea where you are even remotely drawing that conclusion. I’m pretty familiar with the crazy claims from the left, but I’ve never even heard that one. But to claim that there is even a remote chance that the intent of conservatives is for more children to be abused is a downright evil claim. Why should we even respond to you when you make a claim like that based on nothing?
The vast majority of what libs of tik tok posts is just a lib talking directly to the camera saying what they think or do. Either those things are fake, or they are real. If you are claiming libs of tik tok is lying, then you are claiming libs of tik tok is posting fake videos - people that aren’t really libs saying things they don’t actually think or do. Libs of tik tok isn’t the daily wire - she doesn’t write articles. How else can she lie besides posting fake videos of libs? Are you not actually familiar with what she posts?
What data? they didn’t present anything to assure people it was 100% medical. that would be the first thing i would do if i were them and that were the case.
It can mean both. It can mean something that isn’t urgent. But it can also mean something that isn’t necessary. Elective | definition of elective by Medical dictionary.
We don’t disagree about this. What we disagree about is what should be done in these cases. Are you opposed to laws that stop teachers from doing something about this mental/physical disconnection that is in opposition to what the parents of those kids want to do?
Then why are you opposed to laws that specifically use the term “age-appropriate” when referring to what kids should learn in school about sex?