The 2020 USA POTUS election politics, the civil war, and the world war (Part 1)

Before anyone blasts me for watching the PBS News Hour, I only watch it to keep tabs on the left. I am well aware of the wild liberal bias throughout, and I know about the predominance of liberal funders, too.

Anyway, you never find anything remotely close to a Conservative viewpoint on the PBS News Hour and Judy Woodruff is about as far left as they come. So I was shocked this evening when she interviewed a young woman named Erin Perrine who is communications director for the Trump reelection campaign. First, Trump is always accused of harboring bias against women. I never believed that and realize it’s wrong, but here was still more proof. Second, I had never heard of or from Erin Perrine, but here she was and the woman is obviously whip smart. She put Woodruff squarely in her place as being the inferior intellect. Here is the transcript of the interview:

  • Judy Woodruff:

As President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden make their final pitch to voters in the closing hours before Election Day, let’s check in with both campaigns.

First up, Erin Perrine. She is the communications director for President Trump’s reelection campaign. She has been on the trail with him for days. And she joins us now from Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Erin Perrine, thank you very much for joining us.

We know this is an uphill challenge for the president. One of the challenges he faces is, he’s lost support, according to the polls, among suburban women and among senior citizens. How do you make up for that?

  • Erin Perrine:

Well, at this point, polls are pretty useless.

And we’re looking at voter data modeling, the data infrastructure that we have built, in conjunction with the Republican National Committee, that’s really been the cornerstone of our ground game.

At this point, we are looking at voter turnout, propensity and ballots left to be cast. And when we look at that in the key battleground states, we are showing, state after state, that President Trump is well on his way to victory.

Let’s take Wisconsin, for example. We look at that. When they started their early voting, they were over 12.5 — with 12.5 percent on the voter modeling with Democrat lead. We have cut that down now to about 5.5 percent, again, modeling on a Democrat lead there. On Election Day 2016, they had a 9.5 lead. And with the votes that are being — left to be cast, our contacts, our phone calls and our door-knocks, we’re seeing that our modeling is saying we’re going to win Wisconsin by 100,000 votes.

  • Judy Woodruff:

Let me ask you about another state that the president won in 2016, Arizona.

A few days ago, the head of the Senate Republican Campaign Committee told reporters who were asking about the Senate race in that state and why Martha McSally is behind, the Republican, he said — quote — “The president is losing Arizona. And we think that he and Martha McSally are tied together,” in other words, acknowledging that the president is dragging down Senator McSally.

How do you explain this?

  • Erin Perrine:

Polls don’t matter at this point. It’s about ballots cast and what remains out there.

Again, in Arizona, we have cut substantially into a Democrat voting lead. And our modeling is showing about 100,000-vote advantage for President Trump come Election Day. At this point, polls — polls are moot. It doesn’t matter anymore at this point what a poll or poll doesn’t say.

What we see is our ground game, our advantage. The door-knocks, the phone calls, and the grassroots army for President Trump is what’s going to help put us over the top. We have the candidate and the message.

(CROSSTALK)

Now it’s about getting voters out.

  • Judy Woodruff:

Excuse me.

I just want to quote Ben Ginsberg, longtime Republican activist lawyer involved in Republican campaigns going back many seasons.

He said in a column over the weekend: “My party is destroying itself on the altar of Trump. Republican elected officials, party leaders and voters must recognize how harmful this is to the party’s long-term prospects.”

This is from someone who’s devoted his life to the Republican Party.

  • Erin Perrine:

I have devoted my life to the Republican Party. I’m a proud woman for Trump. I’m proud to be part of this army for the president. I’m proud of the work this president has done.

He has changed the Republican Party in a way no modern political candidate ever did. You will see record-breaking numbers in terms of Black turnout for President Trump, a Republican, in terms of Latino turnout for President Trump, a Republican.

The president changed the Republican Party for the better. And I’m sorry that other folks who maybe aren’t part of this part of the Republican Party feel left behind by a president who has made us a bigger and better party than ever before.

  • Judy Woodruff:

Last quick question.

The president is suggesting on the stump that, unless that results to the election are known, are declared on Tuesday night, they may not be legitimate.

Does he know that a number of elections have not been called until the succeeding days? Certainly, in 2000, it took 37 days for the election to be clear.

How aware is he of history with regard to elections?

  • Erin Perrine:

I would point to the history in 2016 of President Trump’s first election, when he won in the wee hours of the following morning, when he got to come out and make that acceptance speech as becoming the next president of the United States.

What Democrats want to do is sow chaos into this election and call it a red mirage and a smokescreen. Democrats are already trying to sow disinformation into the results of the election to tell the American people they cannot believe what they will see with their own eyes.

We know the data. We know where the voters are. We will get them out. It’s Democrats who are trying to not accept the election results that will come tomorrow, when President Trump wins again.

  • Judy Woodruff:

We’re going to leave it there.

Erin Perrine, who is communications director for the Trump campaign, thank you.

  • Erin Perrine:

Thank you.

It was rather funny the way whip smart young Perrine cut Woodruff, the stupid hopeless old liberal, up.

2 Likes

Lots of details on which states to watch, timing, details of votes and counting, etc, for your election night info.

(Hopefully) on the lighter side

4 Likes
1 Like

Trump not closing deal

Unwanted news this morning for us Trump fans. Following a solid week of hard, multi-state campaigning in effort to close the deal with American voters . . . well . . . it didn’t work.

Rasmussen this morning reporting Trump’s approval down to 49% as of today. It was 52% only a day or two ago. This number jumps around a good bit, and always has. I have seen it down in the lower forties. Regardless, it is today’s number and trend that matters and higher has to be better than a three point fall.

The Trump campaign team appears certain of victory. I dunno. But if Trump is able to eek out a triumph I think his winning margin will be very small.

Add to the above that Biden, right now, is once again campaigning in Pennsylvania. Trump? I dunno. But you have to give Biden credit for continuing to work the voters on election day.

Just a thought

While I continue to hope for Trump victory, this just occurred to me:

If Biden wins instead there will be tens of millions of us out here, people who do not support him and did not vote for him, praying for his continuing good health and especially for his longevity.

3 Likes

That’s good, because when he wins we’ll also have a president that wants to serve all Americans and heal the wounded country from both covid and the Trump virus.

Bad news for any rioters/looters and domestic terror groups though. The new president won’t be supportive of white nationalists and domestic terrorists like the current one.

Taking from one American to give to another American is not serving all Americans.

…unless they offer his son a $200k/month do-nothing job in an area he has no experience or expertise.

4 Likes

So many less-than-informed votes being cast…

Fox and Friends of course.

It’s terrible, peacefully protesting the things you oppose clearly requires far more destruction. Whatever were those vandles thinking?

Vandalism, looting, and rioting are not peaceful protests. One of the two presidential candidates has been consistent and clear on this.

The other has been consistent and clear in his support of white nationalists and domestic terrorists and in the process has created and encouraged the most social unrest we’ve seen in generations.

Certainly only one has tried to stop it…

The crazy part is there are places in NY boarding up their homes and businesses to avoid getting too much of these peaceful post-election celebrations. I’m pretty sure there aren’t enough Trump voters left in NYC these days to cause much trouble, so that leaves protecting themselves from their local BLM supporters. Lots of odd thinking around who’s going to cause trouble.

4 Likes

Those who loot, will loot tonight regardless of what party wins. In their minds it’s free merchandise, after all.

4 Likes

I see the Democrats are setting the stage for their coup if they can’t win the mostly fair fight.

“Under no scenario will Donald Trump be declared a victor on election night,” said Jennifer O’Malley Dillon, Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s campaign manager, in a briefing on Monday.

And yet I’m pretty sure I heard a lot of whining about Trump saying he wouldn’t agree to unconditionally concede election night if it looked like he lost, perhaps due to all the potential fraud in the PA “vote by mail / no signature checking allowed” free for all. Double standards are nothing new in the media coverage this year.

2 Likes

No, Trump has said he’ll declare he’s the winner on “election night” before votes are counted. And laws don’t matter, any votes states don’t finalize by midnight EST aren’t “legitimate” in his view, because “that’s how it should be” despite that never having been how it is.

The tipping point states are slower (historically, and expected this year) to process and certify their results. There would need to be something like an absurd ~20 point polling error (not impossible, just highly improbable) for enough states to be able to be projected in Trump’s favor (which is not, and has never been, the same thing as certified) tonight to get over 270.

There are scenarios that are more likely than a legitimate close win by Trump where Biden could pick up one or a few states as part of a landslide which would make the results known tonight/ overnight.

The third scenario is Biden not winning any of the close states that he doesnt ‘need’ to win by a large enough margin, and it takes more time for the states to finish processing and verifying votes.
Almost every scenario where Trump could legitimately win fall into this third set of scenarios. As insane as it is to envision, the domestic terror organizations Trump directs could even try something like attacking government offices where votes are being processed in an effort to remove absentee ballots.

The third situation is most likely (but hopefully not the last sentence), where there is not enough information for sufficient projections before the morning to determine if either candidate will receive 270 or more electoral votes.

1 Like

let’s hope he can keep the foreign leaders straight moreso than he can his own relatives.

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1323725227487100928