#DiaperDon is no friend of the Jedi…
Hollywood Stupid!! President Trump can have & use any table he desires.
Dumbest posts around, & good job for “Dumb & Dumber” You guys just love it!!
1 Like
The table is for bill signing and cramming in a lot of people in a picture. But a Reddit commenter seems to have solved why Trump used it in this absurd manner to give his temper tantrum “speech.”
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/k2d53m/thanksgiving_day_press_conference/
“was it to make his hands look bigger?”
2 Likes
Trump campaign only paid about $23000 for every additional vote the biggest loser lost by.
““Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.””
Speaking of suspicious, I’m sure this is just some baseless pro-Trump headline.
https://yournews.com/2020/11/27/1943260/all-900-military-ballots-in-fulton-county-georgia-went-to/
1 Like
Maybe try a non-fake-news website? Where is the actual record of 900-0 for that county’s military votes going to Biden?
From the fake news yournews.com:
Jim Hoft, Author at The Gateway Pundit
"Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of "
Oh, right…
“The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories”
There is a long list of citations on the wikipedia page if you care to delve into the nuthouse you are citing an “article” from…
And let’s see who this “Lin Wood” is that the tweets in the “article” are from:
Wood has claimed without evidence that Trump won the presidential election with 70% of the vote.[33] In the course of litigating on behalf of Trump, he has falsely asserted to the media and in court that more votes were cast in Michigan during the 2020 presidential election than the entire population of eligible voters in the state, a conclusion he drew from a mistaken comparison of the Michigan vote total with [Minnesota](Minnesota - Wikipedia) population data.[34]
Wood has circulated multiple debunked videos alleging that Cobb County shredded evidence of voter fraud in the November 2020 general election, and his twitter profile includes the hashtag #WWG1WGA, which is associated with the far-right [Qanon](QAnon - Wikipedia) conspiracy theory."
Perfectly cromulent alternative facts, from a member (or supporter) of a domestic terrorist group. Well done!
Do you also believe there are less than 5.4M eligible voters in Michigan? And that Trump won the 2020 presidential election with 70% of the popular vote?
1 Like
The source is one of Lin’s lawsuits. Sure the link is from a right wing news source, since MSM won’t report on those issues until they’re debunked since “the election is over, and you deplorables lost, stop asking pesky questions.” As Joe said, “it’s time to heel (sic)”.
Lin’s a pretty high power lawyer. I get there are many unsubstantiated claims getting thrown around in these election lawsuits, but it should be pretty easy to check whether or not all 900 of the Fulton GA military ballots were marked for Biden or not. Given the military voting records, that would, shall we say, be highly unusual. His approach of appealing to the Fulton public/military for anyone who thinks their military ballot vote may have been… mis-recorded seems like a good way to search for irregularities.
2 Likes
Do you also believe there are less than 5.4M eligible voters in Michigan? And that Trump won the 2020 presidential election with 70% of the popular vote? What about supporting the Qanon domestic terror group? Or it’s just this last evidence-less claim you are trumpeting as if there’s something there?
What about this, what about that. I’m talking about a specific verifiable claim (all military ballots in Fulton were for Biden) that I find highly suspicious. If there’s evidence that the claim is false, I would be happy to see it. I looked and did not find any, but perhaps this lawsuit is too recent.
It’s not verifiable, where is the verification given? It’s not… there’s just a tweet with no evidence from a nutcase that has a record of outrageous and verifiably false claims.
You have it backwards. Where is the evidence that the off-the-wall claim is true?
1 Like
Hence my referring to it as a “claim”. And the truthiness of that claim can be verified, since it’s not a matter of opinion (I said “verifiable”, not “verified”). How many of those ballots were there and how many were recorded for Biden?
1 Like
“I won the 2020 election, with 81million write in votes! Prove it’s false! Show me proof!”
Hey, there’s another of your “claims.” Waiting for your proof. I’d be happy to see it. It can be verified.
1 Like
It’s very verifiable. Either these 900 ballots are all marked for Biden or they arent, either all those 900 military persons voted for Biden or they did not.
Why so insistant on the claim being baseless, rather than actually verifying the result?
This whole attitude makes it pretty clear that you’re afraid of what might be found lurking in the shadows, rather than being confident that there is nothing there.
2 Likes
Because no basis for the claim has been (or will be) ever provided. The claim came from a domestic terror group supporter, who is so incompetent he can’t tell the difference between MI and MN because the two states start with “M”.
There is no “these 900 ballots”. That’s what’s missing. The actual basis for the claim. Find the basis for the claim, and then it won’t be baseless. Anyone can make up numbers and pick a random county name. Particularly someone with a history of making up bogus numbers and being thrown out of court, and supporting a domestic terror group that makes up conspiracy theories.
A reasonable person who’s focus is on the truth would simply see this as an easy claim to verify. “You used the MN voter roles, MI has a lot more registered voters. Next question?”
But no, instead it’s “BASELESS! IGNORE EVERYTHING HE SAYS! JUST TRUST US, IT’LL BE FINE!”
No. It’s only baseless unless he presents a basis for the claim. Which has not been done. (And will never occur, because it’s a bogus claim…)
If the basis IS presented, then it wouldn’t be baseless anymore…
Listen to a Judge Trump appointed.
1 Like
Well, yeah - that’s part of letting the process play itself out. The judge didnt just declare them baseless, he listened to the arguments and rendered a decision. Which is what should happen. Your ongoing cries of “BASELESS!” is an attempt to preempt that process.
The only rational reason to be so insistant that such questions shouldnt be posed, is if you are afraid of what the answer might be.
No. There was no proof provided. There were no “arguments” to listen to. There was simply no case whatsoever. Because there was no basis. That’s what the decision plainly said.
I never insisted any questions shouldn’t be posed. But it’s nonsense to take claims from a Qanon terrorist at face value, when there is no evidence whatsoever provided by the “source” and the “source” has a history of making demonstrably bogus claims…
Then that judge should be immediately removed from the bench, for deciding a case based on predetermined personal bias rather than the merits of the case.
(The decision may “plainly say” that there was no basis, but that is in fact the judge’s conclusion after having listened to the arguments. Not “No”, as you continue trying to insist. As I said, it’s part of the process playing itself out.)