No, no there are not.
5 Likes
TBF, rare can be “many”, “many” is a qualitative word, not quantitative. Still under study and observance for how common. Common sense would say odds would go up as time after the initial infection increases, and we don’t really have that long of elapsed time even since the people infected early on.
Negative long term effects for people with “mild” or “asymptomatic” infections have been observed much more often than reinfections so far.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects.html
And you’ve repeatedly insisted that without tangible proof, such claims are summarily baseless.
1 Like
??
The numbers of observed infections have been more common as the year has progressed, that’s what the data shows. You can’t possibly detect a reinfection until someone is past the initial infection (taking the obvious observation to an extreme).
Yes, I said they’re still rare…
More “You must cave in to our bullying, or we will make sure no one is going to get anything.”
I’ll say it again, Democrats are making it pretty clear that they don’t think any virus relief is necessary. It’s all about what they want, not what people need. They see the perceived need for aid to be nothing but convenient leverage.
3 Likes
And you can’t possibly have proof of election fraud before the election has happened. Yet for 6 months, all we heard was “Baseless!” any time it was suggested that unilateral rule changes were opening the door for improprieties.
1 Like
Not true. The processes and observances are ongoing before, after, and between elections. If there was any fraud, proof could come to light at any stage.
Our federal government and intelligence agencies have participated through each of these stages of the process to assist state and local officials to ensure our elections in 2020 could be the most secure in our history, and the federal government has concluded they were the most secure (after the election), with no evidence of any sort of widespread fraud. These are all facts. You can disagree with their conclusions and allege a vast conspiracy of inept individuals, but that doesn’t change these statements (of the processes that have occurred, and the conclusions that have been released) from being factual.
These “fraud” allegations are being made with no evidence against GOP controlled elections apparatuses and GOP legislation.
Of course. Obviously, you can have proof of ballots having been cast fraudulently six month before any ballots have been cast (and before the altered rules enabling such fraudulent voing have even been implemented).
1 Like
No, but it could be determined that a weak process was being set up, as well as evidence could have been collected that somehow these GOP election officials and GOP state legislatures were conspiring to throw the election against themselves, as is being alleged…
I didn’t say you could only detect (any) fraud before an election. I said it could occur before, during, or after — any or all of those three. And that’s why there are processes in place through all those stages in an attempt to achieve the maximum security and confidence in any results.
““I miss her so much. If you love your loved ones, take care of them,” he told the outlet, admitting he had been cavalier about the coronavirus. “I wish I would’ve taken it more seriously and had not gone to places like bars, restaurants and such without protection,” he said.”
1 Like
Nobody give Newsom any bright ideas.
2 Likes
Why not just ship all the bio-terrorists to their own state? Won’t they be happy not following any laws? They won’t miss any of the services that can’t run without those “lib elites” with their “fancy degrees” who insist on not dismissing public health officials, epidemiologists, and scientists. Don’t even need doctors to staff hospitals, it’s a hoax and there’s no need if the “lib elites” are excized from the anti government communities.
Frankly, I have little respect for such people. It’s no different than losing the mortgage payment on the craps table. Thinking it won’t happen to you then crying when it does happen to you is pretty willful ignorance.
The fact remains that most people have very little risk of dieing from Covid. Yes, it’s terrible when it does happen to you, but it doesn’t change the risk profile you initially based your decisions on.
If I get sick, I won’t regret doing whatever I did that exposed me. I’ll accept that I was simply one of the unlucky ones.
1 Like
Is this like the double secret probabion?
2 Likes
FTFY
Yes, except in this case the person is not crying that it happened to them. They’re crying because they killed someone else they cared about through their own personal shit choices.
If my choices are affecting you, the choices you have made are equally responsible for that happening.
But instead of owning your own choices, you are expecting me to compensate for them.
Sure they are. When in reality, it wasnt shit choices, they simply were one of the unlucky ones. That’s the whole concept of risk, sometimes it’s going to happen no matter how unlikely - and it’s plain old ignorance to claim that low risk means it wont happen to you, until suddenly it does.
1 Like
Not with the bio terrorists who are breaking the law or even just violating public health directives. The majority of the people decided to elect people to set said laws and establish the health agencies.
That’s the basis of a society and law and order.
Yes, order not only referring to those from law, not everything is a law. There is an “and” in the phrase…
Correct, anti governmental terrorists will not willingly comply with law and order, “Gubment BAD! FreeDumb!”
This is just you intentionally being an asshole. You can try to label people however you want to, the fact is that no one is forcing their way into your home, pinning you down, and breathing in your face for an hour. The fact is, if anything anyone else does is affecting you, you’ve already accepted that risk of exposing yourself to it when you made your own choices.
Going to XYZ (ie, wherever you are choosing to go) is what exposes you to the risk, regardless of who you may or may not run into while there. Instead of owning that choice and the risk that comes with it, you are expecting others to belay their own choices and stay out of your way so you can do what you’ve chosen to do.
There is an element of respect that should be involved in any reasonable society. But that respect needs to be mutual, not so blatantly one sided. Y’all should try it sometime, you just might find it’s more productive than all this self-righteous preaching about how people who disagree with you just suck.
3 Likes
No need to be that critical of BLM
1 Like
Right on!! Get off your media giant networks. (CNN, NBC. MSNBC, on & on) Listen to the real news tonight!!
Fox & OAN.
Your “build better” knight is going to be on the run. We were all told about his scandal months or years ago. Liberal dems tried to erase all Biden China mud before the election.
It’s out there now. (probably to late, but you never know)
He can run but he can’t hide.
1 Like