'Ol doc Fauci signs lucrative agreement with Chinese Wuhan virus creation testing agency.
Fraud was much more than expected I’m sure
2 Likes
Origins
Last week, House members investigating origins of Covid-19 accidentally released a trove of Slack chats and emails between the authors of Nature’s* seminal paper from March 17, 2020, The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 …
all five scientists express belief that escape from the Wuhan lab was at least possible, if not probable:
-
Andersen: “The lab escape version of this is so friggin’ likely because they were already doing this work…
-
Garry: “The major hangup I have is the polybasic cleavahe [sic] site… it’s not really a natural process.” Also: “It’s not crackpot to suggest this could have happened given the GoF research we know is happening.”
-
Lipkin: “[A draft of the paper] does not eliminate the possibility of inadvertent release following adaptation through selection in culture at the institute in Wuhan. Given the scale of the bat CoV research pursued there… we have a nightmare of circumstantial evidence to assess.”
-
Holmes (replying to Lipkin): “I agree… Seems to have been pre-adapted for human spread since the get go. It’s the epidemiology that I find most worrying.”
-
Rambaut: “I am quite convinced it has been put there by evolution (whether natural selection or artificial).”
-
Andersen complains about containment procedures at the WIV. “I’m all for GOF experiments, I think they’re really important,” Andersen writes. “However performing these in BSL-3 (or less) is just completely nuts!”
And then they had a private Zoom call with Fauci, who reminded them who pays their grants and how he’d look bad for funding the creation of Covid under the NIH and his watch, and then everyone got in line and blamed it on raccoon dogs and pangolins.
In totally unrelated news, the US found the Wuhan Lab too dangerous and unsafe for their experiments and cut off all funding. 3.5 years after this was obvious to everyone in the above discussions!
identified significant breaches in safety and security protocol at the Wuhan Institute. The US has also accused China and the lab of stonewalling investigations into those shortcomings.
3 Likes
This is an important article that belongs not only here on the Covid thread, but also in the inflation and the online fraud threads.
On inflation, how do we protect ourselves from the collapse of the dollar?
On fraud, how do we monitor whether someone has applied for government benefits in our name?
Surprisingly, main stream media failed to mention that this wasn’t Bronny James, but rather fully vaccinated Bronny James.
3 Likes
Fauci’s lies on Covid and its origins. Of course he had every reason to lie and cover it up, since his department was funding the Wuhan Lab!
This July, the House subcommittee released what appears to be an extremely incriminating email that Fauci had written on February 1, 2020, to multiple high-level officials, including Francis Collins. In the email Fauci wrote “scientists in Wuhan University are known to have been working on gain-of-function experiments” on bat viruses, and that there was “suspicion” that mutations seen in SARS-CoV-2 were not natural and were “intentionally inserted.” After viewing the email, Rand Paul referred Fauci to the Department of Justice for lying to Congress.
Evidence of Fauci’s purposeful evasiveness can also be seen through the actions of a direct subordinate. Two months after Collins denied funding gain-of-function research, David Morens, a senior advisor to the director of the NIAID—at the time, Fauci—wrote in an email to Bloomberg reporter Jason Gale: “Tony doesn’t want his fingerprints on origin stories.” In the email, Morens said he was tasked with speaking to reporters on behalf of Fauci about the origins of the virus.
Morens emailed Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance: “I try to always communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d constantly.” The Morens email—a bald admission of deliberately attempting to avoid public records requests, in violation of NIH policy—continued: “Yesterday my gmail was hacked, probably by these GOF assholes, and until IT can get it fixed I may have to occasionally email from my NIH account.”
2 Likes
Move along, those email may real but it’s still just fake propaganda, nothing to see here!
1 Like
Senator Rand Paul gives up on DOJ action against Fauci. Sadly, Senator Paul’s backup plan is probably just as partisan as AG Garland. 
1 Like
Finally, some recompense against some jackasses …
According to Judge Stephanos Bibas’ memorandum opinion: Before settling, the University appealed for a stay of proceedings for four reasons. Among them, U Delaware argued that it would suffer irreparable damage.
U Delaware claimed that it would “waste resources helping plaintiffs notify class members” and its reputation would “suffer if former students are told that it may have wronged them,” as characterized by Bibas.
“That reputational risk is not high here,” Bibas wrote.
ETA: After a brief reading of the opinion, I like Judge Bibas (and/or his clerk). I don’t know his political affiliation, but his logic and citing skills are easy to understand and a pleasure to read.
President Joseph Robinette Biden has competing definitions … or just a slight moment of dementia …
The White House informed lawmakers that although they will not be required to receive a COVID test to attend, they will have to mask up and socially distance if they aren’t vaccinated.
“I still may get sick and die, but at least it will be someone who agrees with me that makes me sick!”
1 Like
Unfortunately, the fine will almost certainly be paid by the taxpayers. Bidet’s Delaware is notoriously corrupt, so they will just extract more taxes.
1 Like
Origins. You might remember that well after the election was over, various federal agencies like the FBI and DEA started admitting they thought that covid came from the Wuhan Lab and was not “natural”. The
CIA was not one of these, and it turns out that was because they bribed 6/7 of the scientific panel who thought it did come from the lab to decide that they would rather be… richer, less sure, and still employed. Per whistleblower testimony to Congress -
2 Likes
High death rates, among the young and normally healthy, continue to perplex actuaries.
With the worst of COVID behind us, annual deaths for all causes should be back to pre-pandemic levels — or even lower because of the loss of so many sick and infirm Americans. Instead, the death toll remains “alarming,” “disturbing,” and deserving of “urgent attention,” according to insurance industry articles.
Actuarial reports — used by insurers to inform decisions — show deaths occurring disproportionately among young working-age people. Nonetheless, America’s chief health manager, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, opted in September to archive its excess deaths webpage with a note stating, “these datasets will no longer be updated.”
To some extent, we know what is killing the young, with an actuarial analysis of government data showing mortality increases in liver, kidney and cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. Drug overdoses also soared nationwide, but not primarily in the young working class. Therein lies the most pressing question for insurers, epidemiologists and health agency officials. Why is the traditionally healthiest sector of our society — young, employed, insured workers — dying at such rates?
Of course the authors think it’s the vax, but you can’t say that and get published.
2 Likes
If the victims were not vaccinated, you can bet that would be the emboldened lead of the article - Unvaxxed LeBronny James has heart attack on basketball court, Unvaxxed Damar Hamlin nearly dies of heart attack on football field, etc.
1 Like
it is interesting how memory works
Anthony Fauci, the longtime head of the US National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) seemed sharp as a tack last year while jousting with Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) over ‘gain-of-function’ research he funded in Wuhan, China - however now that the worm has turned, poor Fauci’s memory appears to have failed him
2 Likes
Here’s some of the things he did say, like how the social distancing guidance they just made up.
2 Likes
And do you have a problem with that? It’s intuitive, given that the virus spreads through the air, and the quantity dissipates with distance. I mean, if someone next to you is about to sneeze, don’t you try to move away from the blast area? I always have, it’s not a new behavior.
They didn’t know exactly what they were dealing with and time was of the essence. Also I remember seeing some papers showing how particles settle after a cough or sneeze, with 6 ft being a pretty good guess.
1 Like
It was the basis for mandating business closures/operating limits. It was what kept schools closed, or what allowed them to “safely” reopen. It was the basis of various other restrictions and impositions.
And it was simply made up.
So yes, I have a problem with that. I wouldnt had they presented it as a best-guess, but they didnt. Because guessing doesnt justify all the mandates that followed that were based on those guesses. And when people called them out for just guessing, those people were “cancelled” as being anti-vax nutjobs who want to kill your grandma.
3 Likes