This is simply untrue to the point of being ridiculous. It is folly.
But it is also extremely useful, and most convenient, for the left to promote such lies this close to the election.
I can only thank God that Trump was running things when all this happened and not some Democrat amateur. How easy it is for you Democrats to sit on your high horses and criticize when your own scintillating incompetence is safe from revelation.
1 Like
Along with this, President Trump was being impeached by the radical Loonies on the Left.
Good thing we had a strong President that can handle all the stress going on at that time.
Next issue, adding another Judge to the Supreme Court, making 3… 
3 Likes
Yes, I forgot about their phony impeachment. Talk about the ability to walk and chew gum at the same time!! Trump did it!! Nobody else alive could have dealt with that situation as well as President Trump. And all the Democrats do is try to tear down our country, which they detest.
2 Likes
Do Trump supporters agree with Trump that the election is rigged months before the election? And believe it even though not a shred of evidence has been offered and he refuses to say how? Do they think this is a good thing for a President to do? A chief executive of any sort to rant and rave about such a thing when he has been trying to overtly and admittedly hamstrung the Postal Service and stop mail-in balloting and cut short and modify the census? Would they agree with it if Biden said and did the same things?
Wait, you think they’ll add two states and three justices? Adding just two (if one is pushed through during election) seems more likely as a Trump legacy. Adding three would result in an even number (12) and more possibility for deadlocks.
(Obviously I am intentionally misreading your quote… but I assume you’ll complain you’re confused and think it’s not intentional if I don’t point it out)
Do you Trump haters think so little of yourselves that you expect you’d leave evidence laying around for everyone to see? Obviously, if he knew how exactly, he’d simply stop it. When it’s being done covertly, there is no evidence.
Especially with all the outrage over “Russian interference”, while never commenting on the information itself. What documents/memos/emails are they afraid of the Russians unveiling now?
2 Likes
Obviously, it’s like the Senate - a tie, and the President gets the swing vote. 
1 Like
Trump Endangers Lives of Journalists After He Mocks Reporter Shot With Rubber Bullet
“He got hit on the knee with a canister of tear gas, and he went down. He was down. ‘My knee, my knee,'” Trump said mockingly at his rally from Bemidji, Minnesota. “Nobody cared, these guys didn’t care. They moved him aside. And they just walked right through. It was the most beautiful thing.”
“He got hit on the knee with a canister of tear gas,” President Trump says, of the reporter, who was actually hit by a rubber bullet. “Wasn’t it really a beautiful sight? It’s called law and order.”
The reporter was hit by a rubber bullet, not that Trump cares anything about truth.
“Velshi himself responded to the president on Saturday morning after hearing his comments, asking, “What law did I break while covering an entirely peaceful (yes, entirely peaceful) march?””
Does this sound like a responsible, caring leader of anything?
How can anyone support such a vengeful, sadistic person? Are there really that many vicious, sadistic, hate-filled people that would elect this man again?
Trump Can’t Recall Boasting He Has ‘World’s Best Memory’
At one point in the video, the attorney for the plaintiffs, Jason Forge, asks Trump if he believes he has “one of the best memories in the world.”
A bored, annoyed Trump replies: “That I can’t tell you.”
Forge then notes that Trump had stated on NBC just weeks earlier that he had the “world’s greatest memory.”
Trump responds: “As good as my memory is, I don’t remember that.”
Trump also insisted the “university” had “a lot of very good instructors” , about which he’d heard “a lot of very good things”— yet was unable to name one.
This is like a comedy skit, except real:
“I have the world’s greatest memory.”
“You just said you have the world’s greatest memory.”
“I don’t remember that.”
1 Like
Who said: "“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”
Hint: The same person who led the fight not to hold hearings and a vote for a nominee. Never before in US history had the Senate refused to hold hearings and vote. Never.
Wonderful news this morning! I am deliriously happy:
Rasmussen is showing President Trump’s approval rating at 53%. Straight up, I have never before seen that number so high!
Explanation?
I’ve no clue. Perhaps Americans are having second thoughts about electing a person of Biden’s advanced age. Or it might be his apparent inability to get out and interact as President Trump does routinely. The scripted answers to phony “questions” given to Biden in advance of an exchange with the press could not have helped. The poor guy needs a teleprompter to answer supposedly extemporaneous questions . . . and then he misreads the teleprompter!! I mean, that’s right out of central casting!!
Meanwhile President Trump is out there taking the tough questions, holding his rallies, and just generally being Trump.
But at 53% approval this election could be the biggest blowout for Trump since the Reagan slaughter of poor Mondale back in 1984. Back then President Reagan won 49 states.
Finally, ignore the phony polls that put Biden way out front. It’s easy to concoct such an outcome simply by oversampling Democrats, and that is what most of them do.
2 Likes
As we have said numerous times.
Argyll & the rest of you dems don’t know a joke when you hear one. 
1 Like
-
Rasmussen is a third rate pollster. They generally get almost everything wrong, when comparing actual results to their estimates.
-
“Approval rating” is not the same as a general election poll.
-
“National”
general electionpolls have limited value. State specific can be more useful. Historically, there have been few state specific polls… but the trend is to more of these, and there’s the most state specific polls of highest (relative) quality this year as opposed to any prior cycles. Still flaws of course, polls are all imperfect. And there’s still no or few polls for most states. -
There’s still a lot of uncertainty between now and the election. At any point “favored” or even “highly favored” is no guarantee. In statistics you would expect to see less likely outcomes occur…
538 goes into some details of different polls and how they form their models (and choose to weight different polls) here if you’re interested.
This is just silly. She just plans to do it between Nov and Jan.
A confirmation before election would be an unprecedented move though, regardless of being near the election (confirmations have not gone that fast anytime recently, which such disregard for due diligence).
We just need to listen to Hillary and Obama for how to address filling the court vacancy in these unprecedented times. Or you can look at the long history of how this goes and expect the party controlling the senate to do what’s best for them as they have done in 90% of prior cases.
3 Likes
No, I didn’t say that at all. We’re only 44 days from the election. Nomination has not even been announced or delivered yet. Completing the confirmation in under 44 days is what would be unprecedented for recent history (and a clear disregard for any semblance of due diligence whatsoever).
Not just that it’s right before the election, which also does not have precedent.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/19/politics/supreme-court-justice-confirmations-timeline/index.html
You have to go back to 1981 for Sandra Day O Connor to get just slightly under 45 days, but she was also confirmed 99-0…
Same with Stevens (98-0).
No justice has been rammed through in a partisan manner in under 43 days from the nomination being received by the senate (not just announced, which has
hasn’t even happened yet), in several generations. You’d have to go back more than 70 years to find a shorter confirmation time with only ~half the senate supporting (48-16 in 1949).
1 Like
“You can’t have this guy as your president,” Trump argued. “You can’t have — maybe I’ll sign an executive order, you cannot have him as your president.”
Trump Apologists:"GUYS, it’s clearly JUST A JOKE about High Crimes! You have no sense of humor!!!
Perfectly reasonable for a President to joke about committing high crimes, shows he’s cognitively there! Person woman man cameraTV… Testing makes more cases, slow the testing down, it’s going to just disappear. ‘they’ say heard mentality! "
1 Like
CNNs confirmation times appear to be 1-2 weeks longer in most cases than those for the same justices described here. I don’t really care enough to track down differences. Here’s the WSJ’s coverage.
1 Like