Nothing will convince them.
5 Likes
They believe Biden received votes from Mars.
They believe Rudy Giuliani.
I haven’t had an opportunity to use the Four Seasons background. Oh darn. We had a FY video conference today. I should have put that up instead of camera off…
Rudy was reaching into his pants to show that woman the votes from Mars.
Those election workers are accepting fraudulent ballots even though the return address is Mars, not Earth.
1 Like
I’m not aware of Sidney Powell, except that she says “I have undisputable evidence”.
I have heard a lot about L. Lin Wood attorney. His years of experience (43). He took on the JonBenet Ramsey murder, to aide her father. I watched that case day-after-day.
Most recently, Nickolas Sandmann defamation suit against CNN +. He won that case, millions of $$'s against CNN. I loved watching CNN Jake Taper squirm & give up.
If the evidence is here, SHOW IT NOW.
That’s easy - go back on time about 2 months and address the security concerns before any voting takes place. Once a fishy smell has set in, there’s no getting rid of it entirely.
1 Like
That’s the frustrating part on the other side - if you have indisputable evidence, you don’t take a lap giving coy interviews.
1 Like
That’s the frustrating part on the other side - if you have indisputable evidence, you don’t take a lap giving coy interviews.
You also don’t spend so much time pumping conspiracy theories that are so far out of the realm of the possible, let alone the probable.
I don’t think it really speaks to Trump or those around him having a high opinion of his base.
Trump is very contemptuous of his supporters. Privately (and sometimes publicly) he calls them “suckers.”
"Under questioning, the former federal prosecutor, now the private lawyer for Mr Trump, admitted that it was not in fact a voter fraud case, and was instead an election procedures case.
One of the lawyers representing Pennsylvania, Mark Aronchick, said he was shocked that Mr Giuliani was not even attempting to argue the actual complaint before the judge.
“I sat there dumbfounded because the story presented by Mr Giuliani bore no relationship to the actual complaint in the case,” he said.
" “Proof doesn’t come in tweets. Proof doesn’t come in conspiracy theories or press conferences from Rudy Giuliani. Proof comes from introducing evidence into a court of law - something they have failed to do, at every single turn, which is why they have either lost in court or had cases dismissed in court, over and over and over again.”
It’s like Giuliani has become Trump where he believes that whatever he says, thinks, or postulates is true because he says so.
Do Trump supporters think Giuliani is a good lawyer?
Arizona’s Secretary of State is tired of Trumper terrorism.
https://twitter.com/SecretaryHobbs/status/1329142152991969284
Georgia’s Secretary of State is tired of Trumper terrorism as well.
Speaking of threats, you saw the MI election officials were threatened into certifying that vote? They doxxed her kids and made various other legal threats. Now the Republican officials have reversed their approval for the vote, not sure which will stand.
Why is the left so afraid of having Detroit irregularities investigated? It’s not like there wasn’t a history of voting irregularities in Detroit. Because they’d rather win and have power than that people on the other side have confidence in the election. “Unity”
2 Likes
IIRC, hand recount deadline was at midnight. And all they found was a few thousand uncounted votes, which included votes for both major and some minor candidates.
I don’t know which voting machines were used, but I do know that some older voting machines are hackable with physical access. But you have to remember that most R’s voted for Trump in-person, and that is what the day-of results showed. You’d have to have a pretty good estimate of the number of mailed in Biden votes in order to change just enough Trump votes the day of to still win in the end. I’m pretty sure the only way to maintain the audit is to change the vote right when it’s being cast, as doing so later will show up in the audit.
And you’d need physical access to lots of machines. In multiple states. It just seems so highly improbable.
"Why is the left so afraid of having Detroit irregularities investigated? "
How about Livonia? They want to certify that.
Agreed, scripta. And from what I’m seeing this morning it is even less likely that it appeared yesterday to be.
A good and fair question:
Rudy, when younger, was certainly a crackerjack lawyer. But now he is very old . . . nearly as old as Biden I believe. So it certainly is possible he has lost a step or two . . perhaps more than that.
I am not seeing this morning that there is any “there there” with the Trump challenges to the election outcome. Was there cheating? Perhaps. But can Trump prove there was cheating, if there was, in the remaining time available to him?
Nothing is impossible. But it would surprise me if Trump is successful. One smart pundit I heard yesterday estimated Trump’s success chances at 10%. That might be high!
But could Trump come up with proof of cheating in the fullness of time, meaning far more time than is available to him at this point? I might be willing to go 10% if the question is posed that way. Trump would need high tech Biden partisans to develop a conscience and confess. That’s almost surely not gonna happen before January twentieth. Thereafter? Who knows.
Pre-election pro-Democrat bias
On Monday, Burgess Owens, a former NFL player and vocal critic of Colin Kaepernick, was declared the winner of Utah’s 4th Congressional District.
Despite running against an incumbent and trailing by 11% in final polling, Owens prevailed in a race deemed a “toss-up” by Cook Political Report, a “nonpartisan” election and campaign analysis group popular among legacy media outlets.
Ahead of the 2020 election, Cook listed 27 races as “toss-ups,” meaning they were too close to predict one way or the other. Republicans won all 27.
That’s not a typo. Despite being assured that conservatism was about to drown beneath an impending “blue wave,” Republicans won every single close race.
Republicans also won all 26 races deemed “leaning or likely Republican,” and even picked up 7 of the 36 seats listed as “leaning or likely Democrat.”
Despite nearly unanimous predictions that Democrats would further cement control of the House, they now hold just a 218-204 advantage, with Republicans poised to pick up more seats, as they lead in 8 of the remaining 13 races.
Republican dominance in supposedly 50-50 districts is yet another reminder of just how wrong polls were in 2020, and how wrong they have been for some time. What should embarrass pollsters most, though, is not the fact that they were wrong, but how one-sided they were in the process.
Across the board, pollsters routinely underrepresented support for Republicans while falsely painting a picture of impending Democrat dominance. Are the American people supposed to think that it’s a coincidence that nearly every time a poll missed the mark in 2020 — which was often — it was in favor of Democrats?
How many state and federal races were impacted by incorrect polling that showed stronger support for Democrats than actually existed? Think of the donors who refrained from giving to a candidate because the polls indicated that the race was already over. How many candidates missed out on key endorsements or support from outside entities because they were viewed as a lost cause?
We’ll never know the answer to these questions, but what we do know is that pollsters will continue to mislead and misinform so long as they have a media willing to prop them up. It’s a cycle we’ve seen far too often: the leftist legacy media creates a narrative, then promotes polls which reinforce that narrative. When the polls turn out to be an inaccurate representation of reality — like in 2016, 2018 and 2020 — the media quickly moves on to the next news cycle, never taking responsibility or facing retribution for the error in their ways.
2 Likes