The 2020 USA POTUS election politics, the civil war, and the world war (Part 1)

"Amendment 1. No president shall be removed from office for treason, bribery, or any other crime or misdemeanor, no matter how high, should a partisan minority of the Senate choose to protect him.

Amendment 2. Congressional oversight shall be optional. No congressional subpoena or demand for testimony or documents shall bind a president who chooses to ignore it.

Amendment 3. Congressional appropriations shall be suggestions. The president may choose whether or not to comply with congressional spending laws, and Congress shall have no recourse should a president declare that his own priorities supersede Congress’s instructions.

Amendment 4. The president shall have authority to make appointments as he sees fit, without the advice and consent of the Senate, provided he deems his appointees to be acting, temporary, or otherwise exempt from the ordinary confirmation process.

Amendment 5. The president shall have unconstrained authority to dangle and issue pardons for the purpose of obstructing justice, tampering with witnesses, and forestalling investigations.

"

1 Like

That’s a lot of pillows.

Let he who has not been arrested for trespassing in the Senate chambers cast the first stone.

https://mobile.twitter.com/mbracemoore/status/1363528715444092934

“You know, I walked in when I was 21, and I got arrested,” Biden began. “It was a Saturday, I was down visiting some friends at Georgetown University, and I come up on a Saturday morning because I was always fascinated with the Senate. They had a Saturday session.”

“In those days, no guards stopping you everywhere. And they just got out of session. I walked in the back, all of a sudden I found myself in the chamber. I was stunned. I walked up, sat down in the presiding officer’s seat, guy grabbed by the shoulder, said: ‘you’re under arrest,’” Biden told Letterman.

Of course in his younger days, Biden the politician made up a lot of stuff so maybe he was making this up too.

If I am a Republican to you, then you surely are a communist. Because only a true communist would hold political positions so far to the left as to be incapable of discerning the difference between a Republican and a Conservative.

Few can rise to the challenge. But communists are even more loathsome than Democrats. And communists, least of all, get to define Conservatism.

1 Like

A key finding was that people with extremist attitudes tended to think about the world in black and white terms, and struggled with complex tasks that required intricate mental steps, said lead author Dr Leor Zmigrod at Cambridge’s department of psychology.

Idiots? Or just not too smart I guess.

——

I read some things about how your political leanings are fairly inheritable, and more genetic than environmental, twin studies maybe. So before you (generic) blame those jerks on the other side of the aisle, consider they might not have had much choice in thinking so poorly about things. Unlike you of course, who can see the unvarnished truth clear as day.

They found that somewhat more than half of the difference in self-identified political ideology (56%) is explained by genetic factors.

Sort of because they decide their pre-conceived political opinions are reality and not just a created construct, so they can’t step outside it and improve themselves.

They tend to harp on things that validate their worldview and misremember things that don’t conform to their worldview.

Trump on the tax decision. Wouldn’t have fit in a tweet anyway.

“This investigation is a continuation of the greatest political Witch Hunt in the history of our Country, whether it was the never ending $32 million Mueller hoax, which already investigated everything that could possibly be investigated, ‘Russia Russia Russia,’ where there was a finding of ‘No Collusion,’ or two ridiculous ‘Crazy Nancy’ inspired impeachment attempts where I was found NOT GUILTY. It just never ends!

So now, for more than two years, New York City has been looking at almost every transaction I’ve ever done, including seeking tax returns which were done by among the biggest and most prestigious law and accounting firms in the U.S. The Tea Party was treated far better by the IRS than Donald Trump. The Supreme Court never should have let this “fishing expedition” happen, but they did. This is something which has never happened to a President before, it is all Democrat-inspired in a totally Democrat location, New York City and State, completely controlled and dominated by a heavily reported enemy of mine, Governor Andrew Cuomo. These are attacks by Democrats willing to do anything to stop the almost 75 million people (the most votes, by far, ever gotten by a sitting president) who voted for me in the election—an election which many people, and experts, feel that I won. I agree!

The new phenomenon of “headhunting” prosecutors and AGs—who try to take down their political opponents using the law as a weapon—is a threat to the very foundation of our liberty. That’s what is done in third world countries. Even worse are those who run for prosecutorial or attorney general offices in far-left states and jurisdictions pledging to take out a political opponent. That’s fascism, not justice—and that is exactly what they are trying to do with respect to me, except that the people of our Country won’t stand for it.

In the meantime, murders and violent crime are up in New York City by record numbers, and nothing is done about it. Our elected officials don’t care. All they focus on is the persecution of President Donald J. Trump.

I will fight on, just as I have, for the last five years (even before I was successfully elected), despite all of the election crimes that were committed against me. We will win!”

A while back, when he was still alive of course, Rush dealt with this:

He observed that, had Trump never run for office, none of this stuff regarding his taxes would be ongoing and Manafort would never have been jailed. This is all political payback. And it goes WELL beyond Trump, to wit:

It satisfies the needs of the elites merely to threaten Trump, cost him a fortune in legal fees, and massively disrupt his life. There is no need actually to jail him. The huge threats at all levels suffice.

The real objective of the elite left, and elite Republicans as well, is to discourage anyone else from following the path Trump trod. They are sending the clearest possible signal regarding the fate awaiting others who might wish to challenge their empire. They know there are VERY few people able to withstand the sort of fusillade they have aimed at Trump for the last five years. How Trump himself has withstood the barrage is beyond my understanding.

The elites guard their power obsessively. It’s a closed club. Try to force your way in and mess up their playpen and you had better be ready for massive retaliation from multiple sources.

Nonsense. Trump has an endless record of fraudulent activities, with lost lawsuits and settlements predating 2016.

Case in point Wikileaks and Julian Assange. He could have lived a normal life, or even worked as a State Captive Journalist at NYT, but he helped facilitate exposing some of the US military and US Democratic Party’s dirty laundry, and for this he’s been either under house arrest or actual arrest for a decade with no guilty verdict in sight. Biden is, incidentally, pursuing the trumped up espionage charges and trying to put him away forever if he can get him extradited to the US from the UK.

Trump changed his opinion of Assange over time, depending on his own personal interests of course…

1 Like

https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-train-carrying-fuel-flames-183037726.html

“A goods train transporting petrol has burst into flames after colliding with a lorry at a level crossing in the US state of Texas, police say.”

“…the train had been carrying “some hazardous material” in trucks near the back, and that a section had to be disconnected and moved away from the fire.”

Thank God it wasn’t transporting wind! There would have been breezes everywhere!

Tacoma honors Ben Franklin by removing his name from one of their parks:

Ben Franklin is over in Tacoma by unanimous vote

What needs to happen next is for the State of Washington to honor President Washington, the father of the USA, by changing the name of their state to something else . . . . . maybe Jackson SSR to honor Jesse, or whatever they like. But they do not deserve to be using President Washington’s name on their deplorably woke socialist state. They are insulting a great man by endeavouring to associate his greatness with their horrible state.

Analysis of the $1.9T spending bill proposal. To no surprise, roughly half is pork, progressive nonsense, and bailouts targeted to Democratic states.

2 Likes

Trump: “I think every single day, Biden makes people miss Donald Trump more. When you see these policies that are literally… causing Texas to freeze, that are cutting off our, you know, power to our, you know, energy grids.”

"
A now deleted TikTok video with the claim can be seen here . In the 0:49 second clip, which has been viewed over 854,500 times, a woman off-camera is heard saying: “Thank you Bill Gates for trying to (expletive) trick us that this is real snow. You’ll see it’s not melting, and it’s going to burn. Snow don’t burn(sic),” says the voice while bringing a lighter to a snowball."

1 Like

Bye bye corrupt guy.

/local to me

1 Like

Trump judge clips Biden’s wings. America benefits.

Thank God for President Trump.

HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge late Tuesday indefinitely banned President Joe Biden’s administration from enforcing a 100-day moratorium on most deportations.

U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton issued a preliminary injunction sought by Texas, which argued the moratorium violated federal law and risked imposing additional costs on the state.

Biden proposed the 100-day pause on deportations during his campaign as part of a larger review of immigration enforcement and an attempt to reverse the priorities of former President Donald Trump. Biden has proposed a sweeping immigration bill that would allow the legalization of an estimated 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally. He has also instituted other guidelines on whom immigration and border agents should target for enforcement.

Tipton, a Trump appointee, initially ruled on Jan. 26 that the moratorium violated federal law on administrative procedure and that the U.S. failed to show why a deportation pause was justified. A temporary restraining order the judge issued was set to expire Tuesday.

Tipton’s ruling did not require deportations to resume at their previous pace. Even without a moratorium, immigration agencies have wide latitude in enforcing removals and processing cases.

But in the days that followed his ruling, authorities deported 15 people to Jamaica and hundreds of others to Central America. The Biden administration has also continued expelling immigrants under a separate process begun by Trump officials, who invoked public-health law due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The legal fight over the deportation ban is an early sign of Republican opposition to Biden’s immigration priorities, just as Democrats and pro-immigrant legal groups fought Trump’s proposals. Almost four years before Tipton’s order, Trump signed a ban on travel from seven countries with predominantly Muslim populations that caused chaos at airports. Legal groups successfully sued to stop implementation of the ban.

It was not immediately clear if the Biden administration will appeal Tipton’s latest ruling. The Justice Department did not seek a stay of Tipton’s earlier temporary restraining order.

Biden doubles down regarding his attacks on women and on Title IX

Biden is doing his very best to deprive American women of valuable benefits they received years ago under Title IX

Biden has the same amount of respect for American women generally as he did years ago for Tara Reade. The leopard cannot change his spots. Yet many American women voted for Biden regardless. :confused:

(AP) The Biden administration has withdrawn government support for a federal lawsuit in Connecticut that seeks to ban transgender athletes from participating in girls’ high school sports.

Connecticut allows high school athletes to compete in sports according to their gender identity. The lawsuit was filed a year ago by several cisgender runners who argue they have been deprived of wins, state titles and athletic opportunities by being forced to compete against two transgender sprinters.

The Justice Department and the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights withdrew their support for the case ahead of a hearing scheduled for Friday on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

The Trump administration’s intervention in the case last year came as state legislatures around the country debated restricting transgender athletes’ participation to their gender assigned at birth. Seventeen states considered such legislation, and Idaho passed a law. The Republican-controlled Mississippi legislature overwhelmingly approved a similar bill earlier this month.

Supporters of restrictions on transgender athletes argue that transgender girls, because they were born male, are naturally stronger, faster and bigger than those born female.

Last March, then-Attorney General William Barr signed what is known as a statement of interest in the Connecticut lawsuit, arguing the state’s policy runs afoul of Title IX, the federal law that allows girls equal educational opportunities, including in athletics.

In a filing Tuesday, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham and other department officials withdrew Barr’s statement, saying, “The government has reconsidered the matter.”

Attorneys for the plaintiffs declined to comment.

The Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference has said it is following a state law that requires all high school students be treated according to their gender identity.

The Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights last spring and summer sent letters threatening to cut off some federal funding to Connecticut school districts that followed the policy.

On Tuesday, the office notified those involved that it was withdrawing those letters “as well as the underlying findings and determinations,” and does not wish to become a party in the lawsuit.

On his first day in office, President Joe Biden signed an executive order prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity in school sports and elsewhere. Former president Donald Trump had rolled back protections for transgender people while in office.

Dan Barrett, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, which represents the two transgender athletes in the lawsuit, said Tuesday’s action represents “a hint that the government, the Department of Education, may now have a different view of Title IX.”

CIAC executive director Glenn Lungarini has said the organization’s transgender policy was formed with federal and state guidance and that multiple courts and federal agencies, including the Justice Department, had previously acknowledged that the term “sex” in Title IX is ambiguous.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said Tuesday he was pleased with the Justice Department’s decision to withdraw Barr’s statement.

“Transgender girls are girls and every woman and girl deserves protection against discrimination. Period,” he said in a statement.